Kenya’s recently implemented eVisa system has ignited a fiery debate, with travel experts divided on its merits. While some see it as a convenient way to streamline border entry, others denounce it as a money-making scheme disguised as progress.
At the heart of the controversy lies the mandatory Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA) for previously visa-exempt countries like Ghana, Malawi, and South Africa. This $32.50 hurdle, with a premium $52.50 option for flight changes, irks Sean Mendis, a former airline executive and travel columnist.
Mendis argues that the ETA is a “complete bait-and-switch,” forcing travelers to submit extensive paperwork, including flight itineraries, hotel bookings, and financial statements, for a single-entry visa. He criticizes the inflexibility of the system, where flight cancellations necessitate a new application and a 72-hour wait, and re-entry within 72 hours is prohibited.
“This system is NOT something to be commended,” Mendis asserts. “It’s basically a cash grab rather than a means of opening borders.” He highlights the disadvantages for frequent travelers who previously enjoyed multiple-entry visas and visa-free entry in the past.
Murugi, a communications specialist, counters Mendis’ claims, suggesting that the $30 fee is reasonable considering travel costs and the broader reach of the eVisa system, encompassing business travelers and conference attendees. However, Murugi acknowledges the onerous paperwork and single-entry limitations.