Kigali, Rwanda – Rwanda’s government vehemently rejected accusations by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) that asylum seekers sent to the country could be at risk of deportation to unsafe nations.
The dispute arose during a UK court case challenging the British government’s policy of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing. UNHCR lawyers argued that Rwanda’s asylum system was inadequate and could lead to a banned practice known as refoulement, where refugees are transferred to countries where they face threats of torture or death. This concern formed a key part of the UK Supreme Court’s ruling last year, deeming the deportation plan unlawful.
“The UNHCR is lying,” Rwandan government spokesperson Yolande Makolo declared in a statement. Makolo further accused the agency of fabricating evidence while simultaneously collaborating with Rwanda to bring migrants from Libya to safety. A UNHCR spokesperson declined to comment.
The Rwandan government countered the UNHCR’s claims, stating that the cases presented in court involved individuals who already held legal status in other countries but didn’t meet Rwandan entry requirements, or those who left Rwanda voluntarily.
The UK government previously announced the first deportation flight to Rwanda was scheduled for July 24th, contingent on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s Conservative Party winning the upcoming national elections on July 4th. However, with the Labour Party holding a significant lead in polls and pledging to scrap the policy, the future of the UK-Rwanda asylum deal remains uncertain.
